<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Dreaming of Robots Blog</title>
  <link>https://dreamingofrobots.com/blog/</link>
  <atom:link href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Posts about robots, building them and the making of Dreaming of Robots.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Why don't we see more robots in our daily lives?</title>
    <link>https://dreamingofrobots.com/blog/why-not-more-robots</link>
    <guid>https://dreamingofrobots.com/blog/why-not-more-robots</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>J.D. Wisgo</dc:creator>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Although there is some robot research I've been working on that I alluded to in the &lt;a href="robotics-revival.html"&gt;last article&lt;/a&gt;, I thought of something else that was pretty important and related to robotics that I wanted to write a short article about.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just FYI, I'm doing this article using voice narration just to give my wrists and fingers a bit of a break from the keyboard, but I don't expect it will affect the content too much.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, the question is, why don't we see more robots in our daily lives? It may sound like a silly question, but it's something I was thinking about just recently and I have some ideas, so I'm going to go ahead and talk about those in a little bit of detail.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;What robots do we see?&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First, what kind of robots do we see in our daily lives? Well, as many of you know, probably one of the most popular robot genres is the &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#cleaning"&gt;vacuum cleaner robots&lt;/a&gt;. For example, Roomba, and the one I have now is a Shark, because I think Roomba is not selling well lately for various reasons. But those are pretty common. I've even seen a few websites that are just called something like robot ratings, that are just about vacuum cleaners. So it's pretty clear that they're very popular. I don't think everybody has them, but I've definitely been to a handful of houses where people have them, and they seem to be pretty commonly used. I don't think they're perfect. There's definitely some issues. But for many types of houses, I think they're totally worth the cost. So that's one type of robot that we do see, at least relatively commonly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another one that maybe is a little less common to actually see in daily life, but I think at least at some point was selling pretty well, is &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#drones"&gt;drones&lt;/a&gt;. You can go somewhere like Best Buy and see a bunch of these drones. Now, those are generally pretty expensive, in the hundreds of dollars. You can get cheaper ones at other places like Walmart and Target, probably in the $40, $50, maybe $100 range. I haven't actually seen too many of those in daily life, just once in a while. I do own a drone, and I use it once in a while. I have lost one and broken a second one, and there's some challenges there. But I think they're a lot of fun. But even having said that, I just don't see them that often in daily life.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What else? Keep in mind, the definition I'm using for a robot here is just anything that's basically a machine that kind of moves around.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One example that just came to mind is a sushi place kind of near me. It's a Japanese company and they have a robot that rolls in and brings your wasabi and your drinks, while playing some funky music. It's not very expressive, but I guess it is kind of cute. It's slow, but it does navigate fairly well, and I've never seen it make any big mistakes. It'll wait until you take off your products and then eventually it will go away. So that's another fair example, I guess.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm struggling to think of other ones. I've definitely heard stories of organizations that own things like &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#quadrupeds"&gt;robot dogs&lt;/a&gt; and use them for inspection or patrol or something. But honestly, I've never seen any of those. I'm sure YouTube is filled with them, but in my daily life, I just don't see them. Maybe I should get out more.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And in my travels as well. I've been to a few places, Japan a few times and a few other countries here and there, and I just really never see many robots. I did talk to a friend recently who said he saw some pretty well-designed robots in Disneyland in California, and I saw a picture of them. They looked pretty cool. So I think there are some rare scenarios like that, like theme parks, where they have enough money and they really care about the atmosphere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That does remind me, there is one robot that I saw in Japan several times in stores, &lt;a class="botlink" href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/robot/pepper"&gt;Pepper&lt;/a&gt;. I saw him a few times. And there was another, a robot hotel called &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henn_na_Hotel" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Henn na Hotel&lt;/a&gt;, that I went to once in Japan. This was three or four years ago, and the theme was that there's nobody in the lobby, there's just robots, and there was a dinosaur there. And again, they weren't very expressive. I think they went out of business, or at least the location that I went to went out of business. I don't think it's there anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And that reminds me, even from decades ago, there's the whole technology area of &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epcot" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Epcot Center&lt;/a&gt; in Florida, and they had kind of a robot theme. If I remember, they had different types of robots or droids. But again, that was something more just to show off, kind of like talking about the future. So I don't really count it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So yeah, I can't really think of much else in terms of actual robots.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;Why is this the case?&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I guess the next question is: why is this the case? Robotics is a field that clearly has been going on for a long time, and from what I've seen, there's some pretty advanced robots out there. Just on this website, I've categorized &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/"&gt;over 600&lt;/a&gt;. I went through a lot of those descriptions myself and edited some of them to get a feel, and it's pretty amazing. I mean, just in the last 20 years, there's been some huge leaps in terms of &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#bipeds"&gt;humanoid robots&lt;/a&gt;, and even things like cooking robots and &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#cleaning"&gt;window robots, pool cleaners&lt;/a&gt;, that kind of thing, things that just weren't around, or at least weren't popular, two decades ago. So there's been huge advances, but it just seems that there are a few things that are stopping them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Shut-in robots&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of my theories is that these robots actually are relatively popular, at least based on some of the sales that I've seen during my research, thousands or millions of units sold in some cases. And frankly, they just sit in people's homes, and maybe they don't use them that long. They buy them and they get bored of them and they throw them out, or they throw them in the garage. I've definitely done that myself with one or two robots when I was younger, but that would help explain where the sales came from and why we don't see them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even if they're using them at home, they probably don't take a lot of these robots outside because frankly, they're not made for outside, like a lot of the more toy types of robots or rovers and stuff. I mean, there are clearly ones made for outside use, but many are inside only.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Fear of loss or damage&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think one of the other concerns is that, frankly, with an expensive robot, even if it is made for outdoor use, the owner is going to be concerned about it getting lost or damaged. Even if it's in theory waterproof, the nicer ones are going to be thousands of dollars. So it's going to be a real risk.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I mentioned my drone earlier. The first one I had was a &lt;a class="botlink" href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/robot/djispark"&gt;DJI Spark&lt;/a&gt;, and it just flew away one day, and they ended up giving me a free drone. Maybe it was because I was near metal or it was a bug in the code, I don't really know. But that's a few hundred dollars, and since then I've been much more careful with how I drive it. And frankly, I'm just afraid to send it out very far.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Similarly, somebody who has a robot, even one that, let's say, runs in the grass, or a robot that walks around outside, probably doesn't want it to get damaged or stolen, or who knows what. So I think that's one of the reasons we don't see them that much in daily life.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Good enough, and worth the money?&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And another one might just be that they're not safe, or effective enough. For example, humanoid robots doing anything that's advanced. Let's say there was a chef robot, and it was able to cook skillfully. The question is, would we put that robot in a restaurant? Would that be cheaper than a real chef? Would it be better, and safer than a real person? In cases like that, I think even now the real chef is probably going to be way better.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That does remind me, there's two places I've seen in Portland, one in a mall and one in downtown Portland, that had a coffee-making robot. It was literally a &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#arms"&gt;robot arm&lt;/a&gt; with a lot of joints, and it was pretty cool and relatively accurate and kind of fun to watch. It was slow, but still pretty cool technology. One of them was in the Washington Square mall, and it left a long time ago. So I'm guessing they just didn't make enough money. There's obviously a lot of coffee shops that are competing. The other one, I forget where it was, but it was a Japanese store in downtown Portland. I think that one's still there. So that's another kind of rare example, but I guess the question is, are some of these robots really good enough? Are they worth the money?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, I read when I was researching robots that the Portland police department had bought one of these super expensive robots. I think it might've been &lt;a class="botlink" href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/robot/spot"&gt;Spot&lt;/a&gt;, one of the $150K robots, which they bought through some grant, but they only use it for really special occasions, like a bomb threat or something really serious. So I guess you're not going to see it just going on everyday patrol, probably for the same reasons.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It reminds me, I was watching a video of Spot. It was a different version, I think the $80,000 version. This is one that I think is designed for inspection of oil places and such, and it uses custom parts, so it's extremely expensive. It's because they haven't mass produced the parts, but anyway, it looks really cool and it moves great. I saw somebody doing an unboxing and demonstration of it, and I think he was controlling it with a joystick or controller type thing, and it fell. I don't know how many hours he was using it, but in the first hour of the video, it just fell. It was walking on a place with some elevation changes, and it just fell and it couldn't get up. So that was a little embarrassing, and a little surprising, I guess, because it's an $80,000 unit and it can't do something as basic as getting up. And I've seen $500 robots getting up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, again, that might've been a rare situation. My guess is when they're actually used in practice, it's more the robot's AI itself than a human, and it's probably very careful about where it walks. Whereas if you're doing it yourself on a controller, it's going to go wherever you tell it to and probably not stop. I don't know, maybe he even hacked it or did something that you're not supposed to do. So it's not a good sample, but nevertheless, it makes me wonder about even these really expensive robots. How good are they? How well can they handle a variety of real-world use cases?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Safety&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Obviously you look at something like a car, the self-driving car, which they've been working on for many years now. It's similar to a robot in many ways. I guess you could kind of call it one if you want. And obviously that's something where if you screw up, you're in serious trouble, because you could have many people going to the hospital and getting injured.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So that's an extreme example, but even a robot that's able to carry heavy items, or even everyday items, is going to need to have pretty strong &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/servo-guide"&gt;servos&lt;/a&gt; or hydraulics or whatever it uses. And that's enough force to potentially injure somebody. So it needs to have good safeguards, maybe somebody watching it. It has to be very careful. So I think that's one of the integration challenges with getting a robot in the real world. Not only does it have to be robust and worth the cost, but it has to be extremely safe. Especially if it's a place where there are kids and the kids are going to walk up to it, you have to be super careful not to hurt anybody, or maybe even not to scare anybody. So there's definitely a lot there that needs to be fulfilled until it's popular.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Programming and testing&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure if there's any other reasons. Like I mentioned earlier, the cost is kind of a big factor. But having said that, as I mentioned in my &lt;a href="robotics-revival.html"&gt;last article&lt;/a&gt;, I think the introduction of strong AI like &lt;a href="https://claude.ai" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Claude&lt;/a&gt; and some of these other platforms makes robot programming a lot easier. It doesn't mean it's &lt;em&gt;good&lt;/em&gt; robot programming. That's something I'm personally working on, to see what level of quality you can get. I'm working on a room navigation project now, but the question is what level of quality can you get using something like Claude, where you're probably not looking at any of the code, or most of the code. It's mostly written indirectly via prompts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And then of course, there's going to be a lot of weird use cases where you don't really know what will happen until you try it, because you've never even seen the code. It's probably too much to read or too hard to read, although I could in theory read it. So instead you need a huge amount of testing. Fortunately there are simulators for a lot of the robots. Even for this stuff I'm doing, I have an ad hoc simulator, but that only goes so far. There's a bunch of things that you just can't capture, at least with the simple simulators. So you've got to do simulation, get as many bugs out as you can, then put it in the real world.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And you can't easily speed that up. I mean, you could buy a hundred units, but you've got to do real tests that take time. If there's a problem, you've got to fix it or return it to the charger yourself or whatever, which is something I'm working with. That's another reason. The actual testing takes a lot of time compared to something that's virtual, where it's all software. We have such fast machines that if you have software, you can just test the heck out of it if you buy a fast machine. Whereas if you have a robot, especially a lot of these advanced ones, they don't move very fast. I think it's probably for safety, and maybe for other reasons as well, like the way the servos are designed, but they generally move relatively slowly compared to a human. And that means it's just going to take that much longer to simulate a single test. Just do some action and see how it works out, then repeat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I'm planning to do a lot of studying robots in the next few months, and I hope I can give a better, more informed opinion on this stuff, because at this point it's more of an opinion piece. But I did want to get these thoughts down, and I hope you found this useful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="post-sign"&gt;—J.D. Wisgo&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Robotics Revival: The revealing of an old passion, the creation of a new website</title>
    <link>https://dreamingofrobots.com/blog/robotics-revival</link>
    <guid>https://dreamingofrobots.com/blog/robotics-revival</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>J.D. Wisgo</dc:creator>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;In our younger days, often we hope that parents or other family members buy us things we want, or even surprise us with things we didn't know we wanted (but end up loving), sometimes because of a special holiday or event. But as adults who are working and earning enough to buy little "unnecessary" things now and then, that responsibility mostly moves to ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have a large number of hobbies, but at the same time am relatively conservative about what I buy. I try to only buy things I'll really get my money's worth, whether it is a gadget I use again and again, or something more intangible like a trip afar that brings new experiences and emotions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It had been some time since I bought myself something special, and I was starting to think about different options. Being into gaming, a new gaming PC or laptop would be nice, though the one I bought a few years ago still works fine, especially since I am not super picky about playing games on the highest settings. I love musical instruments, but honestly I already have enough to last a lifetime, and any purely software purchase is going to keep me on the monitor 100%, which is something I am trying to get away from.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At some point the idea of buying a robot came to mind. As a result of this line of thought, my longtime passion in robots slowly resurfaced. I've been obsessed with Japanese culture for a long time, and robots are a big part of that (Ghost in the Shell, giant robots, etc.). I even took a robotics course in college (University of Florida) where I built &lt;a class="botlink" href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/robot/dendrites"&gt;a few robots that communicated to one another&lt;/a&gt;, and even danced back and forth in unison. But one of my biggest interests over the years has been Sony's &lt;a class="botlink" href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/robot/aiboers1000"&gt;Aibo&lt;/a&gt;, a Japanese robot dog that always seemed too expensive to purchase.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Earlier in the year I discovered the magic of using Claude for coding, which even to this day feels like a miracle technology. I soon started tackling a bunch of hobby projects in my evening and weekend hours, from educational websites to simple games, though nothing has gotten much traction yet. I have been coding since I was very young and am fairly comfortable with it, and even though I enjoy coding, I enjoy the act of creation even more, which is something Claude helps with amazingly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Recently I realized that even though Claude can do some wonderful things, there are limitations to what can be done on a computer. Or perhaps a better way to phrase it is to say that the possibilities Claude provides when using other types of hardware is virtually limitless. Of course I am talking about robots here, loosely defined as some collection of brains, sensors, and actuators that can interact with the environment more deeply than just showing an image or making a sound. This doesn't mean Claude is literally running on the robot, but rather part of the loop of programming and debugging.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I feel like to a certain degree the software side is what has held robotics back (though of course things like servos and especially batteries can always get better than cheaper), and strong AI agents like Claude seem like they might help accelerate evolving certain areas of robotics. If nothing else, it opens up robot development to a much larger audience.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don't remember exactly my desires in my college days, but I think back then I wanted to purse a career in robots. For better or worse I ended up getting a handful of great jobs over the years, but none had any connection to robots. I think breaking into that field late in my career is probably challenging, but still I would like to start gaining hobby experience. Who knows, maybe a few years from now I'll be a robot researcher.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Even though &lt;a class="botlink" href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/robot/aiboers1000"&gt;Aibo was re-released&lt;/a&gt; a few years ago, and I could probably save up enough to buy the cute dog, the programmability and speed of movement is somewhat disappointing. So I decided to do some research of available robots, including &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#quadrupeds"&gt;4-legged dogs&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/#wheeled"&gt;wheeled rovers&lt;/a&gt; that were programmable. Claude was utilized to speed things up, but it still involved a lot of reading and double checking things.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ended up making a few web pages so I could more easily read the results, and after a few days I realized that I might as well make my robot research public and share with other people out there. While surely there are countless robot-related sites out there, I at least had some experience with robots, no small amount of passion, not to mention some ideas for interesting ideas than simply displaying facts about robots.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Shortly after, "Dreaming of Robots" was born, the site you see before you now. Besides having a &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/"&gt;catalogue of over 600 robots&lt;/a&gt;, there is information on &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/parts-of-a-robot"&gt;robot parts&lt;/a&gt; (including detailed pages on &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/servo-guide"&gt;servos&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/raspberry-pi-guide"&gt;Raspberry Pi models&lt;/a&gt;), a &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/glossary"&gt;glossary&lt;/a&gt;, info on &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/stores"&gt;robot stores&lt;/a&gt;, advanced search via tags, &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/compare/"&gt;comparison pages&lt;/a&gt;, and even a &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/finder"&gt;'robot finder'&lt;/a&gt; that helps you find a robot based on a series of questions. As many people like to build robots instead of buying them pre-made, I added a &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/diy/"&gt;DIY section with robot blueprints&lt;/a&gt;. There are other features like "I want this" and basic reviews. I even have some experimental &lt;a href="https://dreamingofrobots.com/graphs"&gt;2d comparison graphs&lt;/a&gt; to view the various constellations of robots.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After creating all the above, I realized that the site needs some personality. I happen to have &lt;a href="https://selftaughtjapanese.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;many years of experience blogging&lt;/a&gt;, so I thought it would be a good way to talk about robots. (By the way, all the text in this blog will be human-written unless otherwise stated.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While searching for a robot gift for myself, I happened to find an old robot in my garage that was surprisingly capable, and have been doing some really cool experiments with that over the last week. Once I make some more progress I'll do a detailed writeup on it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for reading, and keep dreaming of robots!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p class="post-sign"&gt;—J.D. Wisgo&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>
